Bahaha, the first few definitions were tame, and then....I'm guessing you were relating it to number 4 onwards....who would have known it was such a versatile word! My question if- why did they bother changing the name of fags to fads? (lolly cigarettes). We all know what they are meant to be; why not just get rid of them if they are that offensive?
2 comments:
Bahaha, the first few definitions were tame, and then....I'm guessing you were relating it to number 4 onwards....who would have known it was such a versatile word!
My question if- why did they bother changing the name of fags to fads? (lolly cigarettes). We all know what they are meant to be; why not just get rid of them if they are that offensive?
Too funny!!!
Post a Comment